When a new brand identifies an industry gap or an overlooked segment of the population and develops an improved, affordable, and convenient product or service catering to previously ignored consumers. These theories not only illuminate why certain innovations succeed while others fail but also provide actionable frameworks for businesses and individuals to drive change. Disruptive innovation intrigues both scholars and practitioners all over the world, whereas increasing popularity accelerates the exposure of its theoretical issues. Christensen (2006) clarified that the word “disruptive” has many different connotations and is widely misinterpreted, which may be the source of the confusion. He is very open to criticism and claims that the word is not properly chosen to name the phenomenon (Christensen 2014). However, readers who turn to Christensen’s work for a clear-cut definition may disappointingly find the boundaries of disruptive innovation are vague (Weeks 2015).

Free guide to improve your innovation success rate*

• Anonymous expert, computers based on reduced instruction set computing microprocessors interview, November 24, 2014; anonymous expert, direct sales computer retailing interview, February 18, 2015; andanonymous expert, minicomputers interview, October 27, 2014.
• Its essence lies in having two value dimensions (duality), i.e., the traditional one and the new one, which endows disruptive innovation with the potential to encroach on existing markets and open up new markets at the same time.
• Disruptive innovation intrigues both scholars and practitioners all over the world, whereas increasing popularity accelerates the exposure of its theoretical issues.
• This financial prudence is a strategic choice, enabling them to navigate the competitive landscape with a leaner operational model.

The incumbent will not do much to retain its share in a not-so-profitable segment, and will move up-market and focus on its more attractive customers. After a number of such encounters, the incumbent is squeezed into smaller markets than it was previously serving. And then, finally, the disruptive technology meets the demands of the most profitable segment and drives the established company out of the market. In this paper we explore theories of opportunity discovery/creation with reference to the research, development and commercialization process of disruptive innovations. We apply this distinction (and inferences drawn in prior literature) to a number of cases of disruptive innovation (DI), using both known and new examples from mature and emerging markets.

As one of the most disruptive brands in the online realm, Facebook disruptive innovation theory has transformed the way people interact and connect through its diverse range of social media platforms. This step-by-step explanation highlights the key stages of disruptive innovation and emphasizes the factors that contribute to its success. Through innovation, we continuously redefine the boundaries of human potential and create a brighter future.

Keywords

This entry introduces Schumpeter’s philosophy as well as his theoretical construct of creative destruction. He is often credited for starting modern growth theory that is based on the inevitable by-product of the process of development and innovation. Schumpeter’s description of the innovation process and its diffusion continues to be characteristic in the contemporary knowledge- and technologically driven global economy (Carayannis and Ziemnowicz 2007). Dropbox disrupted the traditional file storage and sharing industry by introducing a cloud-based file storage and collaboration platform. The Disruptive Innovation of Netflix BrandNetflix, a disruptive innovation brand, started by revolutionizing the DVD rental industry with its convenient mail-out service.

Disruption 2020: An Interview With Clayton M. Christensen

The latecomers have introduced a new value dimension while recognizing the value dimension pursued by the mainstream market. In the context of disruptive innovation, the enterprise value network manifests itself as two value dimensions. The middle-level factors such as relativity, oversupply, undersupply, price advantage, price disadvantage, and asymmetric incentives are derived from the fundamental level. Furthermore, the external factor of complementary technologies is located at the highest layer of the mesosphere, next to the market level. The market level refers to the potential market phenomenon caused by disruptive innovation, i.e., impacting the existing market, encroaching into the low-end market and opening up the new market. It can be found from the streamlined theory framework disruptive innovation initiated by latecomer enterprises and the sustaining innovation led by incumbent enterprises are the results of enterprises carrying out R&D in different value dimensions.

How Useful Is the Theory of Disruptive Innovation?

The organizational structure and the understanding of technologies or products are all in the service of developing hard drives with faster storage speeds. In fact, the competition among hard drive enterprises was quite fierce at that time, which also intensified the resource inclination of incumbent enterprises on the first value dimension. People love inspiring and encouraging stories, which fosters the increasing popularity of disruptive innovation. Christensen (1997) published his remarkable book The Innovator’s Dilemma and creatively proposed the disruptive innovation theory to explain how startups defeat powerful and well-managed incumbent enterprises. Briefly, in the literature, the process of successful disruptive innovation is typically illustrated in Fig.

GE’s technical expertise extended to power generation, with the creation of the first aircraft turbo-superchargers that laid the foundation for jet engines. Lower cost- this means that the cost of the product or service will be lower than what is currently available. As part of your journey, learn how to realize your potential in business and in life through the power of high performance, innovation, and leadership.

The Impact of Clayton Christensen’s Theory of Disruptive Innovation

Rachel, the bus driver, says noisy behaviour can be highly disruptive when she’s driving.

• Ford’s disruptive innovation transformed the automobile industry by democratizing car ownership and setting a new standard for manufacturing efficiency.
• The encroachment of the former on the latter’s market can effectively be analyzed and understood using the duality and relativity of disruptive innovations.
• Whether you’re a business leader at an established corporation or an innovator at a small startup, understanding the theory of disruptive innovation is vital to remain relevant and gain market share.
• These involve the introduction of innovations into the economy – such as new products, productive techniques, or technology.
• Platforms like Napster and LimeWire allowed users to share songs freely, bypassing traditional distribution channels.
• This reluctance to adapt and break from legacy models ultimately led to Kodak’s bankruptcy in 2012, serving as a cautionary tale about ignoring disruptive innovation.

The advent of minicomputers marked a shift, and the invention of desktop computers further democratized access to computing power, reaching homes worldwide. Subsequent innovations like laptops and smartphones continued this democratization, expanding the market exponentially compared to the exclusive, centralized market of the past. The disruptive journey of personal computers epitomizes the broadening accessibility of technology. P2P accommodation platforms have changed this dynamic, providing a space where individuals can easily list accommodations, promote their offerings, and communicate directly with potential guests.

Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation highlights how new technologies and business models can upend traditional market dynamics, leading to the displacement of incumbent firms. In this article, we’ll examine how disruptive innovation can reshape industries and lure away a dominant company’s existing customers. Whether you’re a business leader at an established corporation or an innovator at a small startup, understanding the theory of disruptive innovation is vital to remain relevant and gain market share. This article provides real-world examples of disruptive innovation to illustrate the potential to tap into overlooked markets. These examples also highlight the common pitfalls of incumbent companies, how they become complacent and believe they’ll retain profitable customers by merely improving existing products and services.

In the dynamic landscape of business, building a distinctive brand that withstands the test of time often requires more than just finding your place in the current market. To assist you in embarking on your path to disruptive innovation in 2023, we have curated a selection of updated examples that showcase companies revolutionizing their industries. Innovation is always key to making a successful disruptive innovation, but it’s not the only thing that matters. Implementation is also critical, as it needs to be done correctly if the product or service is going to be successful.

Identifying Disruptive Technologies: An Intellectual Property-Based View to Disruptive Potential Assessment

This shift from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles, facilitated by mass production, can be seen as meeting the criteria for disruptive innovation as it fundamentally changed the entire transportation system. It revolutionized the transportation industry by offering a more convenient, accessible, and affordable alternative. With a simple tap on a mobile app, users can request a ride to their location, eliminating the need to wait or hail a traditional taxi. This innovative approach has created new opportunities for both passengers and drivers, providing modern and cost-effective transportation solutions. Uber has redefined the concept of transport, offering flexibility and convenience to meet individual needs. Ford’s disruptive innovation transformed the automobile industry by democratizing car ownership and setting a new standard for manufacturing efficiency.

While these innovations bring about changes that may prove beneficial, the resultant products often tend to be overly sophisticated, inaccessible, or prohibitively expensive. This characteristic renders them short-lived, prompting consumers to seek more economical and sometimes radical alternatives to fulfill their needs. In low-end disruption, the disruptor is focused initially on serving the least profitable customer, who is happy with a good enough product.

Homeowners now access a global market of travelers, while guests gain entry to unique and non-standardized accommodations beyond the offerings of traditional hotel chains. The peer-to-peer model fosters a more personalized and diversified hospitality experience. Retail medical clinics stand as a prime example of a disruptive business model that is reshaping the established norms of the hospital and conventional physician’s office paradigm. These clinics offer an alternative venue for patients seeking relief from common ailments like allergies and sinus infections or requiring routine vaccinations and blood tests. The evolution of photography, from film cameras to the ubiquity of mobile phone cameras, unfolds as a narrative of disruptive transformation spanning approximately two decades.

In the realm of Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation, it is crucial to acknowledge that these transformative advancements frequently originate in niche markets or lower-end segments. By targeting these underserved areas with simpler and more affordable solutions, disruptive innovators can gradually gain traction and refine their offerings to appeal to a broader audience. This strategic approach allows them to challenge established market leaders and eventually reshape entire industries, highlighting the power of identifying and capitalising on opportunities in seemingly overlooked market segments. Kodak, once a photography giant, dominated the analog film industry but failed to embrace the digital revolution despite inventing the first digital camera prototype in 1975. Competitors like Sony and Canon seized the opportunity by investing in digital technology and user-friendly designs.